I recently finished reading the latest novel from John
Grisham, The Rooster Bar, and I must
admit to being somewhat disappointed. Grisham is one of my favorite authors and
I’m pretty sure, I haven’t missed one of his novels yet. I was anxious to read
this one and completed it in less than a week.
Grisham, in my opinion, is a great storyteller. His
narration is solid and his stories tend to be fast paced and compelling. Somewhere
around high school I gave up my dreams of becoming a lawyer, but I love movies
and books about the law. Grisham handles the legal aspects well without slowing
down the story and I would highly recommend him to anyone not familiar with
this work.
In The Rooster Bar, the author introduces us to three young
law students with an interesting problem. Lured by the promise of a lucrative
career in the legal profession, Mark, Todd, and Zola have spent their last
several years attending a “third-tier, for-profit law school so mediocre that
its graduates rarely pass the bar, let alone get good jobs.” Deep in debt with
no future prospects, the friends begin taking desperate measures to escape the situation.
I won’t go into the details and spoil the story, but it is
an interesting ride with the usual twists and turns one would expect from
Grisham, a master of the legal thriller genre. My disappointment comes from
what I would consider a lack of sympathetic characters. I want to pull for Mark and Todd and Zola, but I can’t quite ever get
past the idea that they are the victims of their own bad choices. Sure, the law
school is run by a corrupt billionaire exploiting the system, but does that
justify all the other poor decisions the three pile up in response?
Another problem I have is with a subplot involving illegal
immigration. I don’t mind contemporary works bringing in current issues and
events, but the liberal leaning rubbed me the wrong way. Of course, when your
protagonists are running around committing illegal acts throughout the book,
why should a little illegal immigration on the side bother anyone?
Finally, I didn’t like the ending. Only my opinion, of
course, but it felt rushed and abrupt. There was a lot left unresolved and up
in the air, and I was left with plenty of questions. In conclusion, I will say
that I liked the book, but I would not consider it one of Grisham’s best. (My
two favorites are still The Testament
and The Rainmaker. And Bleachers, if you want to include a
non-legal novel.)
No comments:
Post a Comment