I saw a recent Facebook post of someone who claimed to be a proud Liberal and he included the following definition of the term:
As I read this, I wondered where all the Liberals have gone.
I certainly don’t see many of the characteristics above displayed by the
so-called Liberals in the media and the Democratic Party today. And I also wondered how anyone
who actually fits the definition above could have anything to do with the
radical leaders (or policies) of the Party.
Consider the definition. Really think about it. When I see
the vile, disgusting, hatred for the President (and other Conservatives) that
my “liberal” friends post openly on social media, I don’t think “free and
generous heart” or “broad and enlightened mind.” I don’t think, here’s someone
who “advocates liberty of thought or speech.”
The definition above sounds like a really nice, thoughtful
person. I know some people like that and appreciate those qualities, but I
certainly don’t see much of that in today’s politics. Or in the political views
of the Party that is supported by so many proud Liberals.
People with “free and generous hearts” shouldn’t be okay
with the murder of millions of unborn children. People with “broad and
enlightened minds” shouldn’t be so afraid to have a civil discourse with others
who might have different views on social issues. People who “advocate liberty
of speech” shouldn’t be so quick to condemn the rights of others to exercise
their free speech. Nor should any of these “liberals” be okay with the
destruction of our country at the hands of “protesters” who want to “tear down
the system.”
Where in the definition does it say liberals should advocate
violence and stir up racial and class warfare? Some of the most narrow-minded,
bigoted people I know are proud Liberals. Makes me wonder if they even know
what the word liberal means. Maybe
they need a new label for themselves.
I am obviously not a proud liberal, certainly not
in today’s sense of the word. When I consider the anti-American, anti-second
amendment, anti-God, anti-Capitalism, anti-unborn, etc, etc, I see nothing of
the above definition in the Democratic Party. You know, the party that is
supposed to be the liberal alternative to the Conservative Republican Party.
So maybe we need a better definition of liberal. Or maybe we
need to stop thinking of Democrats as liberals. A Liberal like the one described
above shouldn’t be a Democrat. Not today.
No comments:
Post a Comment