The newly elected Congress is now in session and some of the
new members are already causing a stir. I’m anxious to see if all those fine
folks are ready to actually govern and legislate or simply obstruct and
investigate. Hopefully, they will set about doing their actual jobs, starting
with passing a real budget to fund our government, even the “non-essential”
parts. Here are a few of my thoughts on the subject.
In a representative form of government (such as the
Constitutional Republic in which we live), it is the responsibility of the
citizens to choose people who will “represent” them at the various levels. I
wrote an article a while back encouraging voters to be informed, rather than
ignorant, and to be smart enough to elect representatives who actually shared
their beliefs. I find it truly sad to see how many people fail to understand
this simple concept. And I was surprised that people were offended by the
suggestion!
I think the system works much better on the local level, but
even then there are always occasions that make me wonder. I spent most of my
adult life working in public schools where school board members are locally
elected. I am a firm believer in local control, but electing representatives with
little or no education always seemed foolish to me. I can appreciate that local
citizens, particularly parents, should be involved in setting local policies,
but electing someone with less than a high school degree to the school board?
Seriously? But I have seen it done. And I have watched people like this rant
and rave and propose outlandish things because they didn’t know and understand
the system. Or the law. Over the years, I’ve had frequent conversations with
various board members in which I often said the same thing over and over,
“That’s not legal.” Well-intentioned or not, they were ignorant of the law and
sometimes even the most basic of educational procedures. Yet, they had been
chosen to represent their community.
When you get beyond the level of city government, you find
other issues. No matter how well-meaning someone might be, it just becomes more
and more difficult for an individual to truly represent a large and sometimes
diverse population. As a Texan, I understand that there are areas of my state
that have an entirely different set of values and priorities than myself.
Having 36 US House members gives us some chance to provide representation for
all, but choosing only two people to represent all of us in the Senate is not
an easy task.
And then of course, there’s the Presidency. Is it even
remotely possible to elect a single person who can represent all of us?
Probably not, but that’s okay. It’s why the founders created such a delicate
system of checks and balances. Liberals, you will survive Donald Trump, just
like the Conservatives survived the Obama years. The reality is that we need to
trust the system and stop acting like a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a
tantrum every time we don’t get our way. (We also need to stop acting like
everything Trump says is solely his individual opinion. Like it or not, 63
million people in this country voted for him because they too share some of
those same beliefs.)
Which brings me back to my original question, who represents
you? Sadly, many politicians have become such public figures that I wonder if
they truly still represent their constituents or not. Many appear to be looking
out for themselves and worrying mostly about how to get re-elected. On the
national level, most have become extremely wealthy and many border on being
celebrities who appear almost daily on the news. Are they still representing
the people who elected them, or are they seeking fame and fortune and maybe
looking for that next high paying job in politics? The Presidency perhaps?
I was thinking about one of the newest members of Congress,
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She has certainly made herself a celebrity rather
quickly. I wonder why the people of New York would choose her to represent
them. I can understand the appeal of picking someone born and raised in your
district, a person who understands the trials and tribulations of your
particular area. But when you grab an obscure part-time waitress/bartender and
send her to Congress, shouldn’t you expect some questions? (That would be like
picking some junior senator/community organizer and making him the president!) More
troubling, of course, is the fact that she is an avowed Socialist with apparently
no real understanding of how government works.
Some of her more recent comments have made her the “queen of
the meme” and Dinesh D’Souza, author and filmmaker, recently called her “the
stupidest person elected to public office.” https://www.newsweek.com/dinesh-dsouza-says-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-stupidest-person-elected-public-1231393
I understand his point, but has he looked around Washington lately? Congress
seems to be over-represented by stupid people. Between Spartacus, Lie-awatha,
Pelosi, Schumer, Waters, etc. there seems to be no shortage of clowns. I just
hope the people I have voted for will stay on task and stay out of the news. (It’s
not about you! You’re supposed to be up there representing me!)
But as for AOC, honestly, I hope she does well. I hope she
learns and matures and becomes a true representative of her congressional
district. The people there chose her. Hopefully, she will do what is best for
those people and remember why they sent her to Congress in the first place. And
the same goes for the rest of those folks in office. Remember who sent you
there and why!
No comments:
Post a Comment