In any professional sport, there will always be some
debate about the designation of the GOAT
– the Greatest Of All Time. Although there are a few sports
which have a clear choice, in many, there are differing opinions, and often
legitimate arguments to be made for various individuals.
In football, Tom
Brady is considered by most fans to be the GOAT, although there are still
people who prefer Joe Montana, or even some of the players from previous
generations, such as the great Jim Brown. The NFL has certainly had some great
players, but it’s hard to overlook Brady’s record.
One of the hottest current debates centers around the NBA.
Despite the accomplishments of LeBron James, many (including myself) will
always look no further than Michael
Jordan when seeking the sport’s GOAT. Or why not Kobe Bryant, Wilt
Chamberlain, or Bill Russell?
In hockey, there are Wayne
Gretsky fans and others who support Gordie Howe. In soccer, there are
several names usually mentioned including Lionel Messi, Landon Donovan, Diego
Maradondo, or even the renowned Pele from years past.
Boxing has Muhammed
Ali, baseball has Babe Ruth,
golf has Jack Nicklaus (or Tiger
Woods), and men’s tennis has Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, or Novak Djokovic. Or
maybe a legendary great such as Rod Laver. Sometimes it really is difficult to
decide on a single person. Another huge debate is in the sport of women’s
tennis. The recently retired Serena Williams is certainly one of the greatest
female tennis players of all time, but not everyone would agree that she is the
best ever.
Margaret Court could
be considered the GOAT. So could Martina Navratilova. I have a hard time
thinking of anyone more dominant in her time than Steffi Graf. Or maybe Serena really is the greatest, but it’s not
as clear cut as some people would think.
I suppose the hardest aspect of the debate (in any sport) is
the reality that it is nearly impossible to compare players from different
eras. Things change. Rules change. Equipment changes. The level of competition
varies. I guess that’s why so many people try to base the decision purely on
statistics. That of course leads to even more debate.
The problem there is longevity. Any player who performs at a high enough level, and stays healthy
and active over a long period of time will invariably accumulate some
impressive statistics. That’s a given. And those records that result are worthy
accomplishments. BUT, such records alone don’t necessarily prove that a
particular player is better than others who may have had comparatively shorter
careers. And being Good for a very
long time, doesn’t necessarily make one Great.
And (IMHO) no offense to LeBron or Serena, but athletes who
nominate themselves, campaign for the designation, or feel the need to argue in
favor of themselves? You’re probably not the GOAT. Just saying.
No comments:
Post a Comment